Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement

Portuguese youth vs 32 European nations in landmark climate case

A new legal battle has begun at the European Court of Human Rights, this time with claimants arguing discrimination. 

All European Union member states are listed among the defendants, in addition to Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Russia and Turkey. 

The youngest individual involved in brining the action is aged 11. Claimants say that inaction on the part of governments in response to the climate crisis amounts to discrimination against young people. The logic being that younger generations will feel the brunt of actions today taken today.

The lawsuit is supported by Global Legal Action Network, which has described the action as ‘truly a David and Goliath case’. 2017 wildfires that killed more than 100 people in Portugal sparked the decision to begin pursuing legal grounds for a case, with such events becoming more intense and regular in the years since.

Portugal was listed among the biggest victims of European wildfires in a recent study. According to the research, the estimated total loss of land alone from blazes in summer 2023 amounts to well over €3billion. This does not include property and possessions.

In addition, young people behind the ECHR case list exposure to extreme heat and associated problems with sleep and concentration, and overall anxiety about the climate crisis, as issues that have arisen due to negligence, inaction and ‘discrimination’ at a governmental level. 

The trial began on Wednesday 27th September and the verdict could represent another in a series of landmark legal rulings tied to the environment in recent months. These include a case in Montana, where the judge ruled in favour of young people arguing state government failure to provide a safe and healthy environment was illegal.

More on environmental law: 

Is ‘Youth v Montana’ climate court ruling really a landmark?

 

Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis